- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 14:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Highsnobiety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of notability, no independent reliable sources. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No independent, reliable, third-party sources to establish WP:N. Article's subject fails notability guideline. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Doesn't assert notability. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 01:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete They did get a mention in the NYT: http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=Highsnobiety&srchst=cse But still doesn't say enough about them to really be notable yet. Northwestgnome (talk) 01:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment COI- notice the publisher mentioned in the article and the creator's username. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - totally non-notable; inserted by COI spammer with illicit username. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unless fixed, a definite delete. --Piazzajordan2 (Talk.) 05:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.