Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Johanningmeier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Johanningmeier

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources doesn't meet WP:GNG SpareSeiko (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SpareSeiko (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notable since Google gave me several notable sourceCommanderWaterford (talk) 18:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)s in a quick search, just needed to be added.[reply]
Keep I added information from notable sources (Variety, Deadline, Playbill) as well as full filmography to improve content Buzzers1 (talk) 20:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Of the article's sources, 1 and 2 are trivial, 3 is IMDb 4 is a self-published source from Phillip Silverstone, whose article was deleted as "not notable" - not considered a subject-matter expert. 5 quotes her, but does not establish any significant coverage. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 06:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider validity of sources highlighted. The keep !votes are not compelling.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NACTOR; I added a Chicago Sun-Times and a ReelChicago review for her recent film, and a Hollywood Reporter review of a previous film, as well as a Getty Images reference indicating she was a guest star on a television show that is noted in other press as part of her career (e.g. Chicago Tribune), so it looks like Johanningmeier has "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows," and has just recently cleared this criteria with her latest film. I also think the filmography chart is a great addition but it could be split into films and television shows to make her acting career more clear. Beccaynr (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.