Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HIP 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of stars in Pisces. czar 05:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HIP 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claim to notability for this star under WP:NASTRO and I can find nothing notable about it. Lithopsian (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD template was removed twice from the article. Possibly without malice since this is a very new editor. 90.216.178.120 (talk) 10:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The object has a simbad entry [1], but otherwise I could find no secondary sources suitable to satisfy WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I don't see a compelling merge target either. Hence, delete --Mark viking (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of stars in Pisces, surely.—S Marshall T/C 19:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't in that list as far as I can tell, so it would have to be a merge. Given that basic data is verifiable from simbad, I'd be OK with a merge into that list. --Mark viking (talk) 20:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a merge might be more than is needed. What I had in mind was more of a smerge, but I think we're basically coming from the same place here.—S Marshall T/C 22:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are in agreement. --Mark viking (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.