Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Lopez (music executive)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Lopez (music executive)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo type content fails NMUSIC Sanketio31 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sanketio31 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG for coverage in multiple reliable sources like NYTimes, Billboard, Forbes, Reuters, The Hollywood Reporter and many more. Also, if content is promo type cleanup should be done instead of deletion. Viewhexes (talk) 20:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked sock. MER-C 09:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the references cited by Viewhexes passes WP:BASIC comfortably. Chirota (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per MER-C. Chirota (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiro725: How about cleanup instead of deletion? Looks quite notable as you also highlighted. Maybe a second consideration. Riteboke (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam. I blocked the author and quarantined the article, but they created a sock account (above) to revert the move. Sockpuppetry like this should not be rewarded. MER-C 09:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well it looks like there is some sockpupettery present in this article. As this is an AFD discussion, without a doubt this executive is quite notable and had made a major impact in music industry. Infact if article gets kept cleanup is surely needed to make it as per wiki neutrality. Riteboke (talk) 13:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Changing to delete as per @Onel5969: and @MER-C: UPE should not be rewarded. Riteboke (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep and cleanup Cleanup is needed as per @Riteboke:. Looking up at the sources seems this article satisfies notability guidelines for WP:NMUSIC. RockOften (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Onel5969 and all above. RockOften (talk) 17:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per MER-C - UPE should not be rewarded, that's how it gets encouraged. If someone wants to recreate, no issue with that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: I would love to create it if given chance. As I am sort of music guy myself and love to write and create pages about music people :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riteboke (talk • contribs) 17:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.