Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunahar Zamindari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – Joe (talk) 09:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gunahar Zamindari

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable aristocracy, which is hardly mentioned in any source. The current article is a glorified family tree. Nothing in vernacular media excluding ref 3 [ref 2 is a content aggregator; unreliable]. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I am not in a position to judge whether zamindars are notable. The palace may be a notable building (I do not know). I very much doubt the marriages of daughters and jobs of descendants are notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.