Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Bay Southwest High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green Bay Southwest High School

Basically a sandbox of childish vandalism since article creation, does not assert notability Splintercellguy 04:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN school. TJ Spyke 04:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless a WP:RS is found for the claim about curling: "Three of the nations best players came from this school, and all went on to become Olympians" and said people are listed in the article in a "Notable alumni" section. (I see nothing else about the school that might otherwise even remotely confer notability on it). cab 05:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Normally, I am OK with articles on high schools being kept or merged with the school district, but I have serious reservations about this article, since nonsense and vandalism seems to infest it right from the first revision. First revision for instance makes the claim "currently housing rouchly [sic] 31,337 students". The author's second revision of the article was this diff, turning the page into an attack article. Later nonsense consists of turning the foundation year into 1337, as well as a load of other nonsense including 1337 derivatives (1337 students, 13:37 student/teacher ratio, etc.) All the revisions I can see here are either vandalism, or at best good faith reversions of vandalism to older versions which are still nonsense. Considering the outright rotten condition of this article, I will have to recommend deletion and restarting from scratch. There is nothing worth keeping in this article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't assert notability, and per Sjakkalle, seems to be a vandal magnet. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 08:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While I'm sure that 6 x 1337 encodes some satanic message, the rest is content-free, from beginning till now. (OMG, my network is a work of the devil?) Shenme 10:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless the article is vastly improved and multiple reliable sourcees with nontrivial coverage added by the end of the deletion debate. The article lacks independent sources to show notability and has never had a worthwhile version from the get-go, amongst the numerous vandalisms such as the swimming pool being radioactive. There is a problem with quantitive concepts in the article, such as "This school has a remarkably high student::teacher ratio, placing it amongst the best in the region." A quality school would have a LOW ratio. Poorly written unreferenced stub.Edison 14:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but allow recreation - right now, it's a blatant WP:HOAX in that every peice of information in the article is false. The addresss, number of students, principle, et cetera are all in conflict with the source. That doesn't mean the article can't be written - but this isn't it. WilyD 15:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Noroton 17:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a vandal magnet. Anyone who seriously works to improve this article but who isn't going to be around to monitor it would just set the stage for a revival of the same show. Do not salt as I've seen one admin do after one of these deletion debates. I wish I'd called the admin on it at the time because there wasn't a consensus for salting and the admin was stepping way over the line. Give responsible future editors the chance to recreate a real article in the future. If a vandal recreates it, we can salt it then.Noroton 17:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as patent leet nonsense. Wow, we can use numbers as a code for similar looking letters. Aren't we cool. --Butseriouslyfolks 17:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. Acalamari 18:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but allow re-creation as per WilyD. Article should probably be titled "Southwest High School (Green Bay)" anyway. High school articles should all probably be semi-protected to prevent vandalism (an argument for another forum, I know), but this one was vandalism to start with.LaMenta3 21:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments. Could we maybe speedy this per WP:SNOW, and the fact that the vandalism to this just won't stop.
Also, it may be a good idea to protect it for just a couple of weeks, so maybe these little dorks will forget about it and move on, and then it can be recreated as a proper article. --Sable232 20:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, don't protect for now but if vandalism continues then this may be necessary. Xarr 16:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Artaxiad 21:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.