Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great MÄR-Heaven Wars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (non admin, {{db-afd}}) per consensus. Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great MÄR-Heaven Wars

Entirely plot summary, therefore failing WP:NOT#PLOT. Fails to assert any notability through secondary sources, thereby also failing WP:FICT. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 23:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 23:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you conflicted me at the very last second before I pressed save. Basically, I support a deletion. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 23:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's why TWINKLE > Manual methods. :) Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 23:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has merit, it is linked to several other articles detailing other aspects of the managa details. I think it should be cleaned up and the mar war article as well. scope_creep 00:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fact it discusses a fictional topic in great detail is irrelevant. The problem that must be addressed is whether this article is notable under Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). To be so, it must receive coverage from reliable secondary sources that have commented significantly on the topic. This appears not be the case, as this is a specific plot element of the entire series. Furthermore, this article is entirely plot summary, making it unsuitable as an article per WP:NOT#PLOT. Until these concerns are addressed, the article should be deleted. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 00:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:Plot and WP:WAF. Ridernyc 00:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Consists of only plot. Adequate sources to add real world context are not available. Jay32183 01:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violates WP:NOT#PLOT and unlikely reliable secondary sources can be found to establish notability per WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy 19:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.