Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopinath Jiu Temple, Fandauk
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gopinath Jiu Temple, Fandauk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searches in English and Bengali found only routine police blotter coverage of a petty theft from the temple in 2017, and the arrest the next day of the miscreants believed responsible. All we know about this run-of-the-mill place of worship from reliable sources is that it had at least 5 brass idols, 1 stone idol, the equivalent of about US$14 in cash, and a pair of cymbals. Such is not sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time to justify a stand alone Wikipedia article about the temple. Worldbruce (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Hinduism, and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Support deletion based on notability grounds per reasoning of nominator MaxnaCarta (talk) 01:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - The robbery is more notable than the building, but at least there are some decent sources.[1][2][3] It is also disappointing how bad the creator's draft was - for example the 17:30 30 August 2021 version says "The tradition of this temple is 100 of years old." But one of the sources says that a "hundred year old stone idol of Vishnu had been stolen". I wish there were a relevant article where we could put this information - but I cannot find one.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.