- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as copyvio. Copyvios cannot be kept and edited; the policy is, we have to start over. Mangojuicetalk 15:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, possible violation of WP:BIO. One relevant Google hit [1] that shows the article violates WP:COPYVIO. Love, Travel Plaza Babes 16:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it's copyvio from [2] Dlyons493 Talk 17:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Close, use {{copyvio}} instead, Google test inapplicable for historical figures, speedy delete no longer applicable. hateless 18:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, does not violate WP:BIO. Historical figure. Possible WP:COPYVIO concern is valid though. Article should be cleaned-up and possibly re-written completely to remove WP:COPYVIO concerns. The fact that it violates WP:COPYVIO indicates it has at least one independent, verifiable source out there. Seems historical to me. I say keep, tag for Copyright Violation, and work to clean-up. Scorpiondollprincess 18:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Kramden4700 02:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Nominator and second delete vote are indef-blocked socks of User:Spotteddogsdotorg. AgentPeppermint 22:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable historical figure in Japanese history. If there is copyright violations, then copyedit, what's so hard about copyediting a few sentences? --HResearcher 11:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is to rewrite the article using verifiable source material. You up for hitting the local library? ~ trialsanderrors 08:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V. If someone provides sources before closing this AfD, this vote can be ignored. ~ trialsanderrors 08:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.