Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnop!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bungie and redirect. (non-admin closure) f e minist 05:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gnop!

(Find video game sources: "Gnop!" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Fails WP:PRODUCT for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The only sources that I could find were passing mentions in a couple of books. - Mr X 19:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:06, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bungie, with a small mention of Gnop!. Looking through the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I can find a couple of mentions: Kokatu, GoodGame, GameZone, Game Informer, but they all just mention it in passing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 10:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- If redirected, it should actually be merged, as there is content on the current Gnop article not currently summarized on the Bungie article. --Pfhorrest (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and I guess I should register my vote to Keep while I'm here as well. It's a small article about a small game but small articles are fine, and it's definitely notable for its importance in the history of a big notable company as soetermans' sources (and those in the article itself) testify. --Pfhorrest (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bungie. The article cites only primary sources (often for statements for which primary sources cannot be considered reliable), so there's nothing worth keeping or merging.--Martin IIIa (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & redirect to Bungie per Soetermans. Not independently notable based on the amount of coverage, but should be mentioned in the main article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
merge (after beefing up with soeterman's sources, here some more:https://archive.org/stream/GMRMagazine/GMR_24_Jan_2005#page/n129/mode/2up/search/gnop https://archive.org/stream/OXM_2010_02-web#page/n33/mode/2up/search/gnop), can be included well into bungie. Shaddim (talk) 19:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.