The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus seems to keep this article even though there is room for improvement. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gigi Chao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was a redirect to the father's article for many years. Recently, an editor removed the redirect and wrote a short article. The article was tagged for WP:A7, which I declined but at the same time I felt there wasn't enough notability for a standalone article, so I reinstated the redirect. The editor in favor of an article reverted. Although it may not qualify as an A7, the article fails WP:GNG. The article is mainly about a fight between a father and daughter over her sexuality, and because of the wealth and notoriety of the father attracts some coverage in the media. Is that enough? I don't think so, but the community will decide. Some of the language, BTW, in the short article is over-the-top. Bbb23 (talk) 12:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.