Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George and Helen Adie
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- George and Helen Adie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was Prodded but, because it has a fair number of references, I think that it needs wider consideration, hopefully by editors with some knowledge of the field. The original Prod reason was "Fails WP:GNG". Procedural nomination on which I have no view. TerriersFan (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. For only one reason. I can't see how this meets WP:GNG. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 10:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.