Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furness Premier Football League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Furness Premier Football League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Many recent discussions on leagues at the same level and with similar weak claims to notability have been closed as delete, for example Guildford and Woking Alliance League and Mid-Somerset Football League.

This league is at least 3 tiers below the rule-of-thumb provided by WP:FOOTYN and so WP:GNG needs to be met to qualify for an article. Google searches come back with very, very little. The best that I can find are some passing mentions in NWE Mail such as this and this. A league needs to have significant coverage in more than one news source, especially considering that it's a minor local paper. British newspaper searches of "Furness Premier League" and "Furness Premier Football League" returned absolutely nothing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, for the usual reasons. RobinCarmody (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Devokewater ^(talk) 11:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it's just not notable.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.