Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun 100 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fun 100 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band, not reliably sourced as having any significant claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The strongest notability claim in evidence here is having had mid-level hits on Canada's campus radio charts -- but NMUSIC #2 is only passed by IFPI-certified charts on the order of Billboard, not by ChartAttack or earshot or CBC Radio 3. Otherwise, there's almost nothing else of substance stated here, and other than the WP:BADCHARTS the only other reference here is an unrecoverable dead link from a shortlived alt-weekly in their own hometown -- and even that is being used solely to support a statement that the band got coverage in that publication, rather than any useful or potentially noteworthy information about the band, and one piece of coverage is not enough all by itself to hand them a WP:GNG based exemption from having to pass any actual NMUSIC criteria.
Note as well that the result of the first discussion is not a definitive veto over reconsidering this now, as Wikipedia's inclusion and sourcing standards are a lot different in 2020 than they were in 2006. Bearcat (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.