Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franklin Academy (Connecticut)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin Academy (Connecticut) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Possibly) a lack of significant coverage in RS, not sure if it's enough to meet WP:NSCHOOL. A few news outlet sources - I only found [1] and [2] and the article currently cites two Hartford Courant articles from before, and the first year of, the school's lifetime. ~Bluecrystal004 (talk · contribs) 04:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - serious WP:UNDUE issues. Pretty much the entirety of reliably sourced information is about the unrelated institutions that used the real estate this institution currently occupies. It doesn't belong in this article. A possible ATD might be to redirect it to the education section of the appropriate settlement article where telling the story of multiple educational institutions using the same property might be more appropriate. 174.212.228.83 (talk) 05:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC) (I'm trying to strike this vote, but it isn't rendering correctly. 174.212.228.83 (talk) 04:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

  • Keep - well-established boarding school yet without a controversy, refreshing. -- Saintstephen000 (talk)
    • Saintstephen000, an argument that actually applies at AFD would be nice. Neither age or reputation are factors in deletion. Off point !votes are routinely discounted when closing an AFD, so effectively, you've done nothing here but waste both your, and everyone else's time. It pays to read the instructions. 174.212.228.83 (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for taking the time to read and kindly respond with a gentle correction. we will certainly take your well-intentioned suggestions under advisement. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Comment: Any interested editors are invited to contribute to a text dispute discussion on this article's talk page. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.