Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco Rico Castro
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Francisco Rico Castro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously WP:PRODded, now recreated. The subject is a player for Real Madrid Castilla (Real Madrid reserve team), playing in a non-fully professional division (Segunda División B), and with no competitive appearances with Real Madrid's first team. The subject therefore fails WP:ATHLETE. Angelo (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ATH and, as far as my searching can tell, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources.--Mkativerata (talk) 07:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As stated above, since he doesn't play in a fully pro league, he fails WP:ATHLETE, and I can't find any significant coverage to merit keeping this article under WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.