Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forsale.Plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forsale.Plus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No visible notability (if not straightforward advertising). Of the 7 sources, 1 is the company's own website, 2 are in Romanian and 3 are passing mentions in general pieces about online auctions. Ingratis (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article and sourcing are thin, and notability is not established despite the company having been in business since 2015.TH1980 (talk) 04:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable, and sourcing is pretty bad (at least one, the "Harbinger Times", is part of a PR network). - DoubleCross (‡) 05:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The Romanian references are a generic search page and a page on house-buying, neither covering this company. There are also passing mentions and a relaunch announcement, neither of which meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches find more relaunch PR in April 2020 but I see nothing to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is an online website so do you think WP:NCORP applies here? Quitede (talk) 01:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprises nowadays often operate through online channels; I would not say that avoids their consideration against the WP:NCORP criteria. In this case, I would not see Forsale.Plus as meeting WP:WEBCRIT either. AllyD (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and kindly allow me time to add more references to the article because it meets GNG criteria. Quitede (talk) 01:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:WEBPAGE. The language of the references is irrelevant, if it meets criteria. The first Romanian newspaper link is either broken or does not reference the subject at all. Ifnord (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.