Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ford O'Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Ford O'Connell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ford O'Connell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page created by SPAs (possible COI) - references are all primary sources or brief mentions. A WP:BEFORE search does not find anything to show meeting WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Melcous (talk) 02:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. It's not enough to be a political pundit and columnist; there must be significant coverage of the subject. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
• Delete widely quoted, lots of hits in searches on his name, but not finding WP:SIGCOV and sources on the page are mostly primary and fall far short of SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.