Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flesh Hunter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flesh Hunter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like page on an unremarkable film series that does not list any independent secondary sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. No significant RS coverage can be found.

The page lists several awards. The awards (even if not PR driven, of which I'm not convinced), do not overcome the lack of RS per WP:WHYN. For closed AfDs on comparable articles, please see:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother-Daughter Exchange Club
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlvana (2nd nomination)
Redirect for discussion:Big Tits at School
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Wet Asses (group nomination: five articles were deleted)

K.e.coffman (talk) 23:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom's accurate analysis. No independent reliable sourcing, claimed awards fall far below the NFILM standard of a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SST flyer 07:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.