Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family separation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Family separation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF; This topic header is too general and not likely to lead anywhere; nothing substantive in this article Ohc ^{revolution of our times} 21:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand substantially. An important social/sociological and legal topic. 124.217.188.29 (talk) 08:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't agree with the nominators rationale that the topic is "not likely to lead anywhere" or that it is doomed to be only a dictionary definition. Sources clearly show it passes GNG 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, this article needs to be expanded, not removed.★Trekker (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV and WP:BEFORE. It's literally a basic right enunciated by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, i see nominator's point that this could be too broad as written, as opposed to Trump administration family separation policy. Family separation can happen in so many contexts--for example in cases of child abuse, where separation is intended to be beneficial to the health of the child.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.