- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine a consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fall Back (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article has been a stub for over 1 year and will always remain so, it is a waste of internet/wikipedia space and there is literally no information contained on the page. it could easily be contained in a small section on Dear Jayne home page. Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Wikipedia is not paper, and no space is saved by deleting this page. No virtual space is freed, since the history is still kept on the servers, and this proceeding actually increases the amount of virtual space taken. But that's neither here nor there. The nominator advises that this be included in a small section on the Dear Jayne page - except he has nominated that page for deletion as well, and removed all mention of this single from the page. I think the nominator should make up his mind as to what he is trying to accomplish here. Chubbles (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And if Dear Jayne page is deleted so will the singles etc. At the end of the day a song charting does not make an artist or single notable by itself. The artist has to be notable too. And in this case there is not enough sourced information on the home page (Dear Jayne) and the single page is not notable. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- Then a Merge is appropriate. Chubbles (talk) 18:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.