Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FM 777

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FM 777

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local internet channel with promotional tone. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Internet radio services are not handed an automatic free pass over WP:NMEDIA just because they're technically verifiable as existing, but this isn't sourced anywhere near well enough to pass WP:GNG in lieu: two of the three sources are press releases from the station, and the third is a deadlink whose former content is entirely unverifiable. Bearcat (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The page about the organizer of this project, Arthur Charles, was recently deleted - I think better sources could make that subject suitable for the encyclopedia in the future. However, Charles' individual projects are not themselves clearly recieving enough coverage that pages about them don't seem overly promotional and have significant POV issues. Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.