- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. NW (Talk) 02:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ExifTool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 02:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is a well known digital photo tool with coverage in [1], and [2] as examples from news soruces, but more significantly, many books also point it out a tool for EXIF manipulation, for example: [3], [4], and [5]. -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article needs sources, but the software is notable. roguegeek (talk·cont) 16:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.