- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted as admitted nonsense. Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 20:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4 ghits, neologism. Delete (|-- UlTiMuS 18:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm on second look, more nonsense or WP:NFT than neologism. Either way, nom stands. (|-- UlTiMuS 18:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever it is (I'll go with violating WP:NFT), it sure isn't notable. Delete. -- Kicking222 18:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Verges on speedy delete as patent nonsense. Undeniably something made up in school (or elsewhere) on a very recent day that has no encyclopedic value. The article is also unverifiable, as the "creators" of the admitted nonsense are not even identified. Agent 86 18:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Obvious nonsense. Parodying FSM, which is already a parody? Doesn't make much sense right from the beginning. Also, this:
- It was created by two individuals who were instant messaging each other, typing complete nonsense and developing a story from the chaos. --Wafulz 18:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.