Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edberg–Lendl rivalry
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 15:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Edberg–Lendl rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is just a repository of results and is unsourced. Armbrust Talk Contribs 01:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: simply an (unsourced) tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating this "rivalry". HrafnTalkStalk(P) 14:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand with prose as was done with the others. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 07:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - agree fully with Richard Arthur above.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.