Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco Yosemite Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 22:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eco Yosemite Park

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ship exists but appears unremarkable, I cannot find anything about it in secondary sources. Searching the ship's name gives me ship tracking websites and ecotourism in Yosemite Park. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ship is not notable. Presence on the internet is almost exclusive to ship tracking websites. No coverage available in anything more than passing mentions relating to her builders/operators. I would have suggested a merge to ECO Design if the article existed. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.