Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth Law Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me, or the admins at WP:REFUND know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Law Center

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Of the 13 references, four are self-published, four are dead, three do not mention the organisation, one is a mention because it quotes someone from the organisation, and only one reference (the second one) might be about the center, but it requires registration.

Much or the article is unsourced; much looks like it has been copied from somewhere. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, California, and Colorado. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Appears to be enough here in terms of in-depth secondary sources needed to pass GNG, although there is a lot of work needed to improve it to encyclopedia-level standards. [[1]][[2]] User:Let'srun 15:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I appreciate Let'srun finding those refs, however I read them and I drew a different conclusion. The first was about rights of nature; it included the Earth Law Center, too, but most of that material was in the form of quotes from an Earth Law Center person. The second didn't sufficiently cover Earth Law Center itself. This is a borderline call either way - I encourage others to look at these 2 refs and decide for yourself.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This subject probably should have an article but references are admittedly weak as A.B. noted. I think it would be nice to have preserved in draft space though. - Indefensible (talk) 03:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Revisions since nominated for deletion --> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earth_Law_Center&diff=1170270345&oldid=1167728538 --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to fail WP:NORG at the moment, and has parts written non-encyclopedically. If additional sources are found I have no problem with re-creation. SportingFlyer T·C 12:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.