- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Earl Amyotte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced biography of a person notable only as the leader of an unregistered fringe political party. This was fine under the standards that Wikipedia held when it was first created, but consensus changed and this no longer satisfies WP:NPOL. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- delete no sources on Google or Google News. No notability established. CerealKillerYum (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete; couldn't find significant coverage. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.