- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Debian Social Contract. MBisanz talk 01:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ean Schuessler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vanity article created by User:Eanschuessler and copied verbatim from his website (or vice versa). Related Afd regarding his brother in 2006: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Schuessler. Location (talk) 05:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - looking like self-promotion to me. Deb (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nixie9 (talk • contribs)
- Redirect To Debian Social Contract. I found this one interesting since I know a bit about Debian in general. Schuessler is certainly known for having been part of the creation of the Social Contract, that much is not for debate since it's easily sourced. However, I don't feel that this plus having been president of SPI gets him past WP:GNG because there's nothing else out there. So I feel this fails WP:BIO#2 criteria for a standalone article. However, I don't have a problem with a redirect to the Social Contract article since it's a valid search term, and adding a paragraph or two about the background and people involved in its creation since it's pretty bare at the moment. I'd be more than happy to do that work once the AFD closes. As it stands, without meeting the notability guideline, the article right now is essentially an advert for his company. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.