Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dox records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dox records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches are simply not finding anything actually substantially convincing, there's nothing to suggest there's the noticeable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 14:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Page also has zero references. Meatsgains (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't seem to make a convincing claim to notability, includes zero sources, and the use of the term "Dox Family" as a section heading which occupies half of the page does not suggest disinterest (and indeed, the username of the SPA who created the article happens to also be the name of someone listed as an employee of Dox). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Company doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG. A quick Google search shows only non-indepedent sources, like the company's own website. Omni Flames (talk) 06:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.