Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Commander
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Double Commander (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software which does not appear to be WP:Notable. Tijfo098 (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any reference nor any reviews about the software which could justify it's notability. comment added by Submitmaster (talk • contribs) 10:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no coverage that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable 3rd party references to establish notability of this software. Only provided refs are to developer's site and a French personal site about dinosaurs of unclear relevance to subject. Dialectric (talk) 07:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A search reveals no coverage by reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. --Batard0 (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.