- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dj warrior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable character ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 23:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC
This article is precise to DJ Warriors acomplishments and achievments, in no way is this promotion, COI, or copyright infringement. The acqusations from mr. Sanchez about this being a non-notable character is absolutley propostereus, and there is over 20 references to cite. Mr. Sanchez has a reputation of trying to delete pages with proper references of notable events and characters, and it is obvious this user has a personal grudge against the character which has no base for argument or deletion based on this characters wide notability of being regarded as one of the top DJs in the entertainment industry. Mr. Sanchez obviously has too much time on his hands and should be banned/deleted for his false acqusations, which directly interferes with wikipedias policies on the site being that of an encyclopedia of official information. Thank you for your understanding of this situation and DJ Warrior should have a place to stay on wikipedia as his millions fans including myself would like to cite information on his vast career. --Journaldiction (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)*[reply]
- Comment Author said he's a partner here. That's COI now. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 23:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hold (1 week) Under WP:COI, someone who is a partner should not be the primary editor/creator of an article. The article itself is poorly written, completely uncited, and reads like promotional literature. Throughout the article there will be a claim of something, to which my inside voice says "prove it!", but with no proper refs, it never is proven. Heck, even in the statement above "as his millions of fans..." ... prove it! I would be willing to give someone unrelated to the project (personally, I always recommend whoever did the AfD :-) )a week to properly re-write this article, properly reference it, and see if it can be made into a proper article. PROVE to us that this guy is somehow important, and PROVE every single claim. If nobody can, or nobody is willing, then delete. BMW(drive) 11:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hold (1 week) as per the above comment by BMW(drive)--Woland (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE. The entire article is one giant WP:BLP violation as it completely lacks sources in any way, shape or form, let alone reliable coverage from neutral third party sources. JBsupreme (talk) 07:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete! Gasp! Choke! The stench of WP:VSCA is filling my nostrils! Mixtape personality? Puhleeeze! Eddie.willers (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and slap JournalDiction hard with a trout for trying to use Wikipedia to fulfill his agenda while smearing other editors with his bad faith assumptions. JuJube (talk) 07:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT Wow, are weeks ever short in your part of the world. I have just been advised that the article has been "properly referenced" ... any comments prior to this, eenhh. BMW(drive) 21:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- REPLY I feel like I'm in the movie Se7en except all I see are blogs instead of dead people. JBsupreme (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT It looks like it may meet notability under No. 5 here. "Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture." --Woland (talk) 23:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've rewritten part of the article; I also moved it to match his real name. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 10:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.