- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Den Brother (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film has not begun casting, let alone filming. Therefore, the film clearly fails WP:NFF, which states "films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." The article claims one actor has been cast, but even if it were true (I cannot find sources for this), one actor does not make a whole film. ~ Baron Von Yiffington . talk . contribs 01:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NFF is clear on this issue. No principal photography, no article. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 03:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete would appear to lack the references needed for verifiability, much less notability. Bfigura (talk) 04:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Disney announced only eight days ago their intention to add "six new movies and three series to air over the next two years", Den Brother being one of those six new films. This announcement is by no means sufficient to confer upon the subject enough notability for inclusion on Wikipedia. For now, delete per WP:NFF because the film has not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography and should not have its own article until such a time that this can be confirmed. No prejudice towards recreation should the film one day meet the necessary notability requirements. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete way to early for this one. No significant coverage, not even near to being in production. Fails WP:NFF. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Far too soon for this article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.