Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DemExit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DemExit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A hashtaggy thing that was picked up by a few news media for a little while (including Breitbart). A7 was denied though no valid claim of importance was made. Does not pass GNG, we're NOTNEWS, etc. Drmies (talk) 02:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is mostly just a hashtag, couched in loaded, frequently ungrammatical language, and sourced entirely to right-wing websites like Breitbart and the Unification Church-owned Washington Times. There's nothing encyclopedic about this article. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 04:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- an un-encyclopedic article about a hashtag. Sourcing does not suggest notability at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as a reactionary, hyper-recent neologism that has no demonstration of any lasting notability or impact on anything. Toddst1 (talk) 14:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NEO. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as noted above, fails NEO. Lepricavark (talk) 02:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.