Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DarkRP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Garry's Mod#User-created_content. Nothing sourced to merge. czar 09:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DarkRP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially everything here is from their own website. It would be a valid G11, except that the G11 template was removed by spa. DGG ( talk ) 15:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or merge to Garry's Mod. I found this article at Rock Paper Shotgun, but this seems to be the most in-depth source available from a WP:VG/RS Google custom search. The others are mere trivial mentions, which don't really help toward notability. Since there's at least once source that has written about it, I think a merge may be warranted. I don't know if this would be undue, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, I am not used to Wikipedian Admin Logic, please explain why are you guys taking down the only page that has actually skyrocketed for me down. Gotta <3 Deutscher Schäferhunds (talk) 16:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Aaryan33056: Wikipedia has inclusion criteria. You can read a brief guide at WP:42 and a longer guide at WP:YFA. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 11:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Garry's Mod. I feel that discussing these communities on that article would be worthwhile, but I don't see the topic itself meeting article status that well, esp considering the sources/ Tpdwkouaa (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 09:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.