Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crocodile Creek Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crocodile Creek Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of WP:N. Baum des Lichtes (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: The best of the given references that I can see (two not available) is inclusion of one of their products in a group review. Highbeam turns up product review and licensing announcements. Clearly a company going about its business, but I see nothing to indicate notability. AllyD (talk) 11:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no significant coverage in reliable sources. This is using Wikipedia as a platform for promoting a non-notable company. Steve Quinn (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.