Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coskel University (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coskel University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to just be a small business. The sources provided seem to be press releases posted in blogs. Searches of Google News and Books didn't show any mention at all. Having said that I wish them well but their company does not seem notable enough by WP standards.BigJim707 (talk) 14:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficient mention in third party sources to meet notabilty requirements. Sources cited are all low quality. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: little evidence of significant independent coverage. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 01:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.