Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clones (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 15:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clones (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Its coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search is sparse—there is a review from IGN and potentially one from 4Gamers.de (if that site is reliable). There are a few single-paragraph previews from Destructoid, RPS. All in all, it's just below the threshold of our ability to write a full article on the subject. czar 14:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 14:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Previewed at Destructoid.[1] Reviewed at IGN.[2] Metacritic also suggest it was reviewed at PC Powerplay.[3] Some foreign language coverage.[4][5][6] It's not that notable, but notable enough. - hahnch e n 19:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, not a lot, but definitely some reliable sources. Seems notable enough. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as being sourced enough to pass WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 13:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.