Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical Advisor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical Advisor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website, no independent sources. A Google search renders such fascinating tidbits as them having Facebook and Twitter accounts and an app, but no independent in-depth coverage. Does not meet WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 13:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, website does not appear to be notable. Nakon 03:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.