- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CitySquares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self promotion. It's Monday night, time for Headlines (talk) 00:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unambiguous advertising, no apparent media coverage. --khfan93 (t) (c) 01:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it's pretty clearly advertising, and what's more their primary claim to notability is untrue (or no longer true): the article claims "in the top 1000 of U.S. Internet web sites" but the link cited actually says #4958, and Alexa currently says #10,713 in the US (or 34,916 total). Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, blatant self-promotion, possibly a speedy candidate. --Kinu t/c 08:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.