Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher W. Walker
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Christopher W. Walker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deletion proposed for lack of notability. I've just been Googling to try to find verifiable detail, but all I can find is that he's a businessman who supports a few causes: worthy, but not notable. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 21:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Having recently PRODded the article, which was removed without comment, I’d also searched and found some mentions in the Washington Post [1] [2], but nothing with much depth to it. Much of the current content is unverified, most of the citations are just links to homepages. Cassandra 73 (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to demonstrate that the requirements of WP:BIO are met. Smartse (talk) 18:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The existing references are too soft and better options don't appear to be readily available. Looking at WP:SPIP has encouraged me to say no here. Deconstructhis (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The lack of coverage doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. -- Atama頭 16:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:BIO, notability not demonstrated by sources. ukexpat (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.