Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina (Gundam)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 02:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christina (Gundam)

It's been a few years since I've seen Char's Counterattack, but I don't even remember this character. And based on the article's description, she only makes two cameo appearances in the entire film. This make the character extremely incidental and not even worth merging into the main article or list. Disputed prod Farix (Talk) 20:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Farix (Talk) 21:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question Is she Christina_MacKenzie? They don't say for sure in that article. Is she featured in other media, such as the books? Does anyone have a picture of this character to compare with the other? In the Gundam universe her contributions were significant if she was able to produce Quess_Paraya More information is needed though. Dream Focus 22:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She has a bit more about her in Beltorchika's Children, she dying at the start though. List_of_Gundam_manga_and_novels shows there a lot of books in this series, and most have never been officially translated into English. Was the character found in any of them? Someone who speaks Japanese would have to search, or ask on a Japanese fan forum for Gundam. Dream Focus 00:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as extremely trivial character. DreamGuy (talk) 23:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge . Interesting deletion reason."I forgot about it myself, so the encyclopedia shouldn't have it." Somehow, I thought that having information about things that an individual person won't remember is the purpose of an encyclopedia. That's why people developed writing in the first place DGG (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've rewatched the entire film and it should be perfectly understandable why someone won't remember her. Her total appears amounts to no more than a few seconds, speaks one line, and is never directly named. This is an incredibly trivial character and doesn't belong merged into the main article or into a list. For all practical purposes, she is Random Background Person #305. --Farix (Talk) 13:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, beyond minor character by any reasonable standards. Clearly unnotable and fails both WP:N and WP:NOT. No need for a redirect not a likely search term. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
She is a Delete! umm, seriously, does a character like this bear anything beyond a passing mention in Wikipedia? JuJube (talk) 09:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since no reliable sources establish independent notability for this minor fictional entity.Bali ultimate (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this character is so minor as to not even have a last name, merge to an appropriate character list. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced and trivial - Vartanza (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.