Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Griffin

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Griffin

edit
Chris Griffin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am I the only one who thinks that this page should be merged into a redirect? Sure, he's a main character in one of the most iconic animated series, but the page hardly covers any out-of-universe notability, and a majority of sections or content is unsourced, save for the Creation and Development section. And after doing research I could hardly find any official sources or news coverages on the character that are noteworthy enough to warrant an article, or any at all for that matter; when typing the character's name (or "chris family guy") into Google News, most of the coverages deal with people who just happen to have the same name as him and have no affiliation with Family Guy whatsoever. The closest sources to real-word perspective of the character I could find were the coverages concerning him dating American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift in the episode "Chris Has Got a Date, Date, Date, Date, Date", but considering that it was only a one-time thing that didn't attract much impact, I don't find the information that sufficient to consider the character iconic, despite his series being such. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if an article about a fictional character doesn't have a Reception, Controversy, Criticism, or Cultural impact section, then does that automatically mean it should be merged into a redirect? SoapSoapWhatIsSoap (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note The nom is now blocked and - considering their recent edits - IMO this is a bad faith nomination and could be "speedy kept" or even "spedy deleted" MarnetteD|Talk 02:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Characters of Family Guy. Just being a major character of a long running work does not create notability. We need secondary sources that talk about the character in depth beyond just reiterating plot details. That doesn't appear to exist to a significant degree to allow a standalone article. --MASEM (t) 04:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep as nomination was in bad faith. There are many more egregious cases of excessive in-universe details than this. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Keep There are plenty of news and scholar entries for a better-narrowed Find Sources search. Jclemens (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've checked through several years of that narrower search and can't find any sign of in-depth coverage of the character, outside frequent mentions of being voiced by Seth Green (which is nowhere close to sufficient GNG detail). Just because there are ghits doesn't mean they're usable sources. --MASEM (t) 05:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep major character deserving of own article. Artw (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also appears to be a bad faith nom from a now blocked user. Artw (talk) 06:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chris_Griffin&oldid=1137708487"