Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champion System-Stan's NoTubes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Champion System-Stan's NoTubes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sourced and not notable. Buzzards-Watch Me Work (talk) 02:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No refs does not equate to non-notable. Suggest the nominator withdraws this and reads WP:BEFORE. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable due to no significant or objective coverage. A reference search no notable achievements so not qualifying--Mevagiss (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a new team, so there is less coverage than some of the other, rather spurious cycling team AfDs put forward today, but there is some: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. And here's even the Wall Street Journal: [6]. I think that is sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 14:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes notabilty. --Old Time Music Fan (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as Lugnuts says, only one ref does not equate to non-notable. (if so, a million articles should be deleted) Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sander.v.Ginkel - thanks for the 34 notifications that have just popped up, haha! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:23, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, haha, better one more than less :) Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:27, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.