- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Cencoft OS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable computer operating system, apparently just another Linux clone, possibly a one-person project, no sign of any independent coverage anywhere, no concrete factual information about the system other than that it seems to be a thinly adapted and re-branded derivative of SuSe. Only indication of existence out there is the project's own website. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the nominator's assessment. I was unable to find any independent coverage myself. Someone not using his real name (talk) 00:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - software article lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Ref provided are blog posts and a user-editable site and do not establish notability. A search turned up no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.