The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Miss Minnesota USA. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So she won a contest once, and got engaged years ago. Notability for a single event. Major editors of the page are all banned socks. This diff illustrates why imposing wikipedia pages on non-notable people is a bad idea. Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This is exactly why such barely-notables are not great article subjects. At the very least why can't they be in a very basic list of title holders with the barest minimum of details? Mabalu (talk) 17:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:20, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.