- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 23:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Carol Gould (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This whole page looks like a dressed up resume. It's full of unverified value statements which may well have been written by the subject, or the subject's mother! — Preceding unsigned comment added by English roG (talk • contribs) 2009/07/29 22:24:21
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Theleftorium 18:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
— English roG (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. Nominated by an SPA with no unrelated edits, no bona fide arguments made for deletion, subject appears notable enough. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Passes WP:BIO. 19:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep and send to cleanup. Yes, the article is a mess, but the subject is notable, article can be improved with a little wiki-love, and AfD is not for cleanup. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and get citations. Clean the external links.-- Patrick {oѺ∞} 23:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.