Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cablinasian/old
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 08:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
724 Google hits. It's just what Tiger Woods jokingly calls himself, and doesn't deserve an article of its own. Besdies, it's a already mentioned on the Tiger Woods article. --Khoikhoi 19:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems OK like this and has gotten lots of discussion in the media. -- JJay 20:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At best it's a dictionary definition. Tom Harrison (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, as per JJAy- however if content not kept re-direct to Tiger Woods, which will allow someone to re-create the article at a later date if term becomes more widely used. --Petros471 21:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - dicdef at best. --Daveb 04:26, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's a notable term. -- OldRightist 14:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Khoikhoi 00:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.