Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caïssa Britannia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 07:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Caïssa Britannia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and likely not notable (at least I can not find reliable sourcing). Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete'. The only reliable source seems to be this article in a local magazine or weekly newspaper, which isn't sufficient. Fram (talk) 07:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete — not notable.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable Celestina007 (talk) 14:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Maintain I believe many chess variants can have encyclopedic articles Itswikisam (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.