Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAOS 1O1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CAOS 1O1

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, reliable references to be found. Only social media. Bgwhite (talk) 06:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable hip hopper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:36, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No reliable sources, nothing which passes WP:MUSIC, no evidence of meeting the GNG. Ravenswing 13:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.